| | #21 (permalink) | |
| touge runner Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: sussex
Posts: 244
| Quote:
there are other differences as well as for ACU gold - one its purely a bike test and therefore not relevant to motorsport for the reason above secondly there are actually at least three ACU gold labels .... which mean different things appently I believe that the number of gold rings round the outside of the label vary but i have yet to find anyone that knows what the types actually are. and thirdly - very carefully worded ![]() ACU Gold stickers can be applied to helmets that are suitable for BIKE motorsport and not CAR motorsport therefore as a indication of suitability for drifting they are useless as the helmet may be ok but may not ..... if an ACU gold and a relevent sticker are there then the helmet is fine but definately not with just an gold or a gold with a EC 2205 sticker [/b] Last edited by scrutineer : 14-12-2007 at 23:33. Reason: being careful to protect my RS | |
| | |
| | #22 (permalink) |
| Most wanted ![]() Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Derby, England
Posts: 9,436
| OK then sorry for making you tread over old ground, looks like I'll just have to buy that shit open faced thing for £60. Would it be OK to paint it with ordinary aerosol paint, or would that render the helmet invalid? Cheers. |
| | |
| | #23 (permalink) | |
| touge runner Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: sussex
Posts: 244
| Quote:
http://www.acu.org.uk/uploaded/documents/C%2065-81.pdf they also confirm that the ACU gold is irrelevent as far as car motorsport goes in that they say on there that the gold can be applied to BS6658-85 type B helmets which are purely bike helmets and not suitable for car motorsport.... so therefore the gold label means nothing to us If you get the helmet from a reputable supplier its worth asking them about what you can use for painting ......but above all else never paint over or remove the approval sticker even on a brand new £500 helmet if the standard sticker is not there or not readable then the helmet cannot be used - the scrutineer has to actually see the label to approve it | |
| | |
| | #24 (permalink) | |
| dorifto kingu! ![]() | Quote:
I'm gutted the MX ones aren't enough tho.. they look so purdy! ![]() | |
| | |
| | #25 (permalink) |
| www.TrampDrift.com ![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,142
| This is the new version of the one i have rallynuts.com motorsport : OMP Veloce Helmet NEW motor sports & karting passed EDC regs last year And your not meant to paint them or stick stickers to them! |
| | |
| | #26 (permalink) |
| Most wanted ![]() Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Derby, England
Posts: 9,436
| Gloves rallynuts.com motorsport : Sparco Hurricane Race Gloves - £34 Boots rallynuts.com motorsport : Sparco Top Driver Mid Race Boots - £91 Balaclava rallynuts.com motorsport : Sparco Soft Touch Eyehole Balaclava - £27 Helmet rallynuts.com motorsport : Sparco Club Helmet - £81 Total = £233 Are all these items acceptable? I don't want to buy them then find out the code used is not correct etc. I think most people could stick with the same/similar items as they are some of the cheapest available really. Plus proban HTHughes overalls that I already have. That's a fair amount of safety equipment, but nothing should really wear out or go out of date for a few years, so it's a one-time investment really. And it's only a matter of time before someone is saved by the safety equipment so can't grumble really. |
| | |
| | #27 (permalink) | |
| touge runner Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: sussex
Posts: 244
| all of those look ok so no problems there keep them questions coming - ![]() Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #28 (permalink) |
| Team Green! ![]() Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Aylesbury
Posts: 1,783
| Incase you missed it back in this thread ill put it up again ![]() Batterys ![]() The race cars i deal with have dry cell batterys, in the drivers compartment, with out box's or covers and this is fine for the scrutes at all the CSCC etc race meets Just with some tape over the terminals and that its secure.Is this ok for us? ![]() |
| | |
| | #29 (permalink) |
| dorifto kingu! ![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 693
| * * 4-6. (PRO-AM) Vehicles must have FIA approved racing seat for the driver and does not have to be in date but must be in good condition. i.e. not showing any signs of stress, cracks or damage to the structure of the seat and Fixed using a minimum of four 8mm bolts (ISO 8.8) and 5 sq inch spreader plates Does this mean that using my driftworks subframe (http://www.driftworks.com/catalog/pr...ight-side.html) is no good? Not actually measured its moutning surface but not sure it will be 5 inch square? |
| | |
| | #30 (permalink) | |
| is Stupid ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Essex
Posts: 5,653
| Quote:
Just quote and give us a ![]() | |
| | |
| | #36 (permalink) | |
| touge runner Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: sussex
Posts: 244
| Quote:
by the way when plates are described as 5" they do not have to be square - 6.5x4" 8x3etc is fine if that fits better its the area thats needed marc | |
| | |
| | #40 (permalink) |
| Most wanted ![]() Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Derby, England
Posts: 9,436
| If it is FIA and in good nick then yes it's fine. And if you plan on carrying passengers then the passenger seat and harness both need to be FIA. One quick question though, does the harness have to be FIA in date, or same rules as the seat (good condition regardless of date etc)? |
| | |
![]() |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:06.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8














Just with some tape over the terminals and that its secure.


Linear Mode