
Contact - 0845 86 92 555
sales@driftworks.com
19-03-2008, 14:18
| #81 (permalink) | |
| ChickFoot FTW ![]() | Quote:
There's only a problem with the way you come across when your out to get the correct facts, maybe you should re-read what you post sometimes as it comes across that you are argumentative (not getting at you, just thought you might like to know). Anton333- I'll look forward to when you've finished the project! Maybe when its done (if it works or not) you could do a little write up or something? | |
| |
19-03-2008, 14:19
| #82 (permalink) |
| InitialD erby ![]() | amen bob. A toyota prius is a perfect example. As it contains batterys etc it means the polution to make it is savage. A diesel lupo needs four years to offset its polution because of its lower MPG, a prius needs TWELVE YEARS to offset its production. Then the batterys are really hard to dispose of, so its dirtyer again. Also its beaten hands down on MPG by a diesel lupo. Steer clear of any hybrid car/electric car and get a diesel lupo. And do`nt get me started on hippys in 2cv`s etc. |
| |
19-03-2008, 14:23
| #83 (permalink) | |
| PhinBob | Quote:
It was more of a addition to the mix which is that oil my not be a finite resource. But is something that grows... Now wouldnt that be an interesting twist to the whole debate - "We can add as much CO2 to the atmosphere as the microbes will excrete."It is definately a resource that we are all dependent on, and therefore those that can control its supply can partly control those of us who're dependent on it. I heard a statement recently that the current price of oil was more to do with the West's policy towards the Middle East, than it was to do with the quantity and availability of oil itself, a little bit like "We can't bomb you turds, but we can grip you around your collected scrotums and squeeeeeeze just a little bit... Does that hurt?" ![]() | |
| |
19-03-2008, 14:33
| #85 (permalink) | |
| PhinBob | Quote:
My solution to the worlds energy crisis is simple and sustainable. Use stupid people for fuel. Feeding them on low-cost, high-fat Atkins diets will put their bodies into Ketosis, which means we could harvest the acetone in their breath for use as fuel. When their bodies pack up their corpses can be used to fuel power stations where the electricity can be used to split water into hydrogen fuel and power their TV sets on which they can watch mindnumbing daytime TV that can be specially formulated to keep them happy and amused | |
| |
19-03-2008, 14:37
| #86 (permalink) |
| Jam Hot Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: MK
Posts: 2,190
| Socio-political factors have always had an effect on the cost of oil. The middle east isn't the only place in the world currently pumping oil, but they do have access to some of the most readily available resources. But you have to accept that for whatever reason, currently demand outstrips supply. China has a massive part in that though, with their prodigious oil consumption and government subsidies which make American fuel prices seem astronomical. I think you only need look at the fact that the major oil companies are looking increasingly at new drilling/pumping technologies, and at exotic locations like the deep Atlantic, to realise that there's a problem in terms of keeping up with demand. They don't go there for the fun of it, they go there because it's the last place on earth that can supply the demands. And even then, that won't last. The writing's pretty much on the wall. it has been since the fifties when scientists first started putting their hands in the air and saying "y'know, with our increasing dependency on oil, we're setting ourselves up for a global catastraphe". The only real debate is down to timing. The most optimistic people suggest it will become a major problem in the next hundred years. Some estimations put it closer to a decade. Some even say there's sufficient evidence to say that we have already gone past the peak, and we're sliding down the other side. So hell, we might as well enjoy it while it lasts because ten years from now, the idea of being able to go to a petrol station and fill up on fuel at just over a quid a litre may seem like a distant memory. |
| |
19-03-2008, 14:51
| #87 (permalink) | |
| Team DWYB ![]() Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Beaconsfield, Bucks
Posts: 4,222
| Quote:
Yep, I know i come across as argumentative. Don't worry sweet pea, it's totally intentional. So is the arogence. And the patronising nature in which i reply to critical posts. | |
| |
19-03-2008, 15:20
| #93 (permalink) |
| S1- F.T break! Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,743
| Interesting thread. Shame the thread starter hasn't actually come back with any answers. I do agree with Mr Bizzle personally anyhow though. Too much green scamming and propaganda going on at the moment and people not able to take the time to look at the (lack of) facts. |
| |
19-03-2008, 15:59
| #94 (permalink) | |
| PhinBob | Quote:
A few years ago I worked as part of a team developing a new technology in Ocean seismic surveying which allowed them to go into deeper water than they'd managed before, the ocean bottom mapping was always done years before any thoughts of drilling came in to the picture, and they were searching there because they were banking on barrel costs rising to the point where it was economically viable to drill. Even though its more costly now than its ever been, fuel is not really that expensive, we have oil heating at home, it costs us 50quid a month to heat our house. Our phone bills, and internet cost over 70quid a month, we think our heating costs a lot, but dont really think much about the phone bills. A litre of Evian costs more than a litre of fuel. | |
| |
19-03-2008, 19:26
| #96 (permalink) | |
| Jam Hot Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: MK
Posts: 2,190
| Quote:
By the sounds of it your setup is something like this: Two things to point out - the first is that this is electrolysis. Nothing more, nothing less. The second is that no matter how efficient your means of electrolysis, when we understand the laws of conservation of energy, we have to accept that the chemical energy of the resulting gas is only ever going to be equal to or less than the amount of electrical energy put into the process. Most likely at least 10-20% less, if we're being super generous. And the energy which is being put into the process is going to be generated by the car's alternator, which will only generate about 10% of the energy being put into the engine in the form of fuel. This is to say that the system is full of energy loss. It's not even close to be a perpetual motion device. I'm sorry dude, I'm not trying to have a go at you, it's just that you're trying to do something wich violates the laws of thermodynamics. | |
| |
19-03-2008, 19:38
| #97 (permalink) |
| touge runner ![]() | Hmm, Now I've read this whole thread, and although there's none of the technicalitys I will comment due to lack of knowledge, I will call the man a genius. In a way. Not that I believe it will work, and if so, probably not well. But think publicity... This dude could actually try to promote his project in the media, and actually get sponsors for the "1st all green drift car". He may never make it, but he actually is in a position to get his playtime in the backyard funded by some stupid company that tries to have an environmental friendly profile... You never know. Of course, over time, some professors of this and that will come on breakfast shows and fend this off as a silly idea based on poor research, but he will live on. Stupid people(89% of this worlds population or so...) likes a crazy nut, so maybe he can actually keep it on for quite a while... ![]() |
| |
19-03-2008, 19:49
| #98 (permalink) |
| Trackday Films ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: London - Nurburg
Posts: 1,033
| I'm pretty sure I saw a Scrapheap challenge where they built a tomato launcher using hydrogen that was separated from distilled water, but I honestly have NO idea how it worked. It didn't work very well though, I think the tomato exploded in the barrel. |
| |
20-03-2008, 00:47
| #99 (permalink) | |
| tail slider Join Date: May 2007 Location: Oxford
Posts: 77
| Quote:
From research it a very inefficient cell set up. I only made this one because it was the materials at hand and I wanted to see if it could produce any results. I am aware of the laws of 'conservation of energy' but may be not having rules can open the possibilities. Every one said the world was flat but Columbus still had to go find out for himself. Ok if sticking to the book of modern sciance which most of which is dated back 300 odd ears almost like the bible has many takers is the safe thing to do then be safe. I was never a follower. I like to think outside the box as it's a vaster world out there. Also I posted this up here not for any false fame and not trying to sell anything not looking for inverters as I have nothing new yet. All I'm doing is having a go and I'm not a scientist. The main reason I post it here is maybe someone else is interested in the concept and also try some experiments and see what can spark of from it. Only good can come from it weather it works or not as it's all hands on learning rather being spoon fed science funded by the oil industries. | |
| |
20-03-2008, 00:57
| #100 (permalink) | |
| tail slider Join Date: May 2007 Location: Oxford
Posts: 77
| Quote:
I have just got a wave and pulse generator to do further tests. This may cause more turbulence in the electrolysis thus hopefully producing moor hho gas. | |
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |