
Contact - 0845 86 92 555
sales@driftworks.com
07-07-2008, 23:24
| #1 (permalink) |
| gripper Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 12
| Drifting on LPG With the price of fuel threw the roof has anyone thought about running their cars on LPG at 54p a litre and an octane rating of about 110 ron do you out there think it would be viable , i have 2 LPG filling stations on my way to work i know there wouldnt be a kit for the 200sx or similar but it wouldnt be that difficult to get one to adapt toa turboed 4 pot i know the tanks are large but surely this could be used to your advantage in weight distribution ? Any thoughts ? |
| |
08-07-2008, 00:09
| #3 (permalink) |
| www.manfoot.in ![]() | Used to install lpg for a living. Its good as long as you use a multi point kit. Also useful for mapping , as its mapped in the same way as other aftermarket ecu's . Turbo cars aren't a problem. And it actually helps the turbo as it run's cleaner. If i was building a kit car i'd build it on lpg only with large tanks. ![]() |
| |
08-07-2008, 00:55
| #6 (permalink) |
| spl dori master Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: the shire
Posts: 453
| lpg's like 111 ron! its bloody dragfuel really, but you know that once you shell out £1500 for the fitting the bastard govenrment will stop the cheapness and bung it up to 85p a litre and then you'll spent the whole time crying on your knees but... then again, you've got the option to run on twin fuelsas they say in jazz club.... "nice" ![]() |
| |
08-07-2008, 12:37
| #9 (permalink) |
| D1 street king Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,020
| You should not consider LPG for a performance car. There are too many disadvantages and nonsense as well. First of all LPG aka propan butan bottles are very heavy (methanol even heavier) that all the weight you lost from stripping the car is put back on. Second I wouldn't advice going for 50 liter bottle to save on weight because I can only manage 100km and had to switch to benzin to go home. 100 liter is a must. The main reasons why you don't want the converstion is because if you car does 9l/100km the consumption goes to 13l/100km. Corbs whoever said or estimated 10% power loss is a bit short on truth. I won't give it 50% but I'd say............maybe 35% but it's vehicle dependent. Turbo? Put 50% for me then. You will probably save more money by detuning the turbo or removing it completely from your SR20's. This is my opinion at least. I drove a Golf Mk2, Audi 80, Passat Mk3-4, Lada all on LPG and although I liked it, those cars were run around which is the whole point of LPG. I don't use it anymore and now I drive on Methanol which is a bit dangerous as it doesn't smell and you don't know when your bottle is leaking. Don't worry this stuff is not available in UK. The device is different too. Oh yeah, last summer I managed 130km/h top speed in a 1.6 Golf Mk2 so that kinda speak for itself. And one more important thing to consider. You probably going to suggest 'what if I get the auto switch type, so I can change instantly inside the cabin?'. Well as BOLF already mentioned car must be tuned via ECU, so switching back to benzin some times can cause missfire, but even if it's running smooth the ECU is already mapped to run on LPG and performance is gone down the drain. p.s Niko if you going to ask me again where I got my facts from, I use this site so check it out: Yahoo! Answers - Home |
| |
08-07-2008, 12:46
| #10 (permalink) |
| touge runner Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 170
| Sorry but are you really trying to say a switch to LPG will give a 50% power drop on a turbo car?? How do you explain that? If you advanced the ignition to suit the new octain ratio I dont see why you could get back to the original power as the calorific value isn't far of 95 and it gives additional IAT cooling effect. |
| |
08-07-2008, 12:52
| #11 (permalink) |
| Unroadworthy Join Date: May 2006 Location: 2 miles from the Pod
Posts: 1,146
| Vauxhall championed an LPG Vectra in their one makes series, wasn't eligible for points but did very well indeed! The hotter the other cars got they lost power, cos the LPG ran cooler it seemed to go better than the Petrol based cars. All near-on identical cars too! |
| |
08-07-2008, 13:06
| #13 (permalink) |
| Sick Puppy | I thought LPG cars had higher exhaust gas temps? Not sure how true that is but its what I heard. I had a LPG e30 for a short while, ran fine for a run about, but the conversion looked a bit mickey mouse, so wasn't confident about drifting on it, think it was a single point injection, I wasn't too sure what the consequence of running a bit lean was so never bothered ragging it on gas. If I was to LPG my own car, I'd probably just buy a cheap motor on ebay thats already had a conversion then strip all the gubbins out and swap it all over, there are loads of Landy Discos etc on gas which sell for buttons. |
| |
08-07-2008, 13:30
| #14 (permalink) |
| tail slider Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 77
| umm i think this is what they were on about on the sxoc SXOC Bulletin Board this only a link to it being for sale but im sure if u PM'ed the guy he'd be happy to tell u his experience with LPG. I feel its a great idea for the time being maybe buy one already with the conversion already fitted, but im sure its gonna start catching up with petrol in the not too distant future and will stop seeing any advantages doing the conversion yourself |
| |
08-07-2008, 14:04
| #15 (permalink) |
| D1 street king Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,020
| Fair enough if you setup the ECU to perform at it's best on a gas, but you should expect 15-16 liters per 100km. In perspective thats cars like Hummer, Land Rover etc that do 8 mile to the gallon. LPG is usually setup with economy in mind rather than performance otherwise the whole concept is lost. The Vauxhall race car on LPG sounds like the WTCC 320is 4 cylinder engines producing 280hp. It's some thing I can't achieve with a 10k in my bank. |
| |
08-07-2008, 15:08
| #16 (permalink) | |
| touge runner Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Oxford
Posts: 190
| Quote:
Nevertheless, I'd say running LPG on a 'drifter' which is also a dailydriver might be beneficial in the long run, but for a 'track-only drifter' I'd do some basic maths to calculate if there are any financial benefits. Remember, for those ca. £2000 for the kit/installation, you'll get ca. 1600+ litres of petrol, which means you can go to more than 50 DWYBs or whatnot, assuming you've spending ca. 30 litres/session. And that covers the kit/installation, not the actual LPG you'll end up using, which isn't free either, plus the consumption is higher than on petrol. What comes to performance, I'd put my money on not losing significant power if a high-quality LPG kit is installed/mapped properly. I'm sure someone who has actually fitted LPG-sets professionally can confirm that. But I've got limited knowledge on this topic anyway. Last edited by niko : 08-07-2008 at 15:16. | |
| |
08-07-2008, 16:43
| #17 (permalink) |
| Mighty Mini Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Winsford, Cheshire
Posts: 353
| My Dad's got a 1992 Discovery V8, which is on LPG, it has a pair of 35ltr tanks underneath, and he gets around 180 miles between fill ups. It has a switch inside where you can change between petrol and LPG, and its noticably quicker on petrol, but that said, we were going down the motorway the other day at a constant 85mph, with ease. You could always get it mapped to make it faster if you wanted. By the way it smells funny and the smell follows the car wherever it goes lol |
| |
08-07-2008, 17:47
| #18 (permalink) |
| www.manfoot.in ![]() | If a car uses multi point lpg system and is mapped well , the same or better powers are possible. The guy above slating it sounds like he's only driven the old fashioned mixer type system's . The only adjustments are base idle and full load mixture. Wank I've mapped a Ford v8 pickup on a multi point injection system and GAINED 20% over factory figs on a rolling road.. Subaru wrx's respond well to lpg. No reason why sr20 wouldn't . |
| |
08-07-2008, 19:13
| #19 (permalink) | |
| gripper Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 12
| Im not talking about even using a Dual fuel set up im talking a full conversion utilising injectors and equipment selected for the vehicles performance and usage - a no compromise so to speak Does the LPG have different burn/thermodynamic properties to petrol hence the loss in power ? and i wouldnt be buying a kit , lots of research and careful selection would make a conversion ALOT cheaper than the 2k that people seem to charge ? . Quote:
Not when its half the price and more than a optimax/high octane fuel ? Thanks fot the replies though its food for though , plus it would give me a warm fuzzy feeling to be destroying tyres and robbign the goverment at the same time ![]() Last edited by Stu.750 : 08-07-2008 at 19:17. | |
| |
08-07-2008, 21:08
| #20 (permalink) |
| Dori Mechanic ![]() | A well tuned LPG built the same as petrol system like bolf has said multi point inection and mapped fully will out do a petrol car any day of the weak as said earlier its equivilent to running a higher ron fuel. If your rebuilding ans SR to run 400bhp ie injectors ECU and re-map, its going to be only slightly more expensive to do it on LPG needing a fuel tank aswell. and i'd bet the lpg one would do better. It's something I plan to do anyway but not on an Sr ![]() |
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |